President Donald Trump forcefully pushed back Friday against reports circulating in Iranian state media regarding the contents of a potential agreement between the United States and Iran, dismissing the published details as “Fake News” and accusing Tehran of misrepresenting the terms that had been discussed.
The sharp response came less than a day after Trump publicly expressed optimism about what he described as a possible breakthrough with Iran, a development he had referred to as a “great settlement” while speaking from the Oval Office.
On Friday morning, however, the president used Truth Social to reject claims published by Iran’s Mehr news agency, insisting that the terms being reported bore no resemblance to any actual agreement.
“The terms that Iran leaked out to the Fake News have NOTHING to do with the terms that were agreed to, in writing,” Trump wrote.
He continued by accusing Iranian officials of acting dishonorably and negotiating in bad faith.
“What they said, including their weak and pathetic statement on having a deal, bears no relation to the truth,” Trump said. “Very dishonorable people to deal with. With them, there is no such thing as dealing in good faith.”
Trump’s statement also referenced what he described as a failed drone attack against Indian ships departing the Strait of Hormuz. He condemned the incident in strong terms and demanded that Iran change its behavior.
“Also, their totally rebuffed Drone attack last night against Indian Ships leaving the Hormuz Strait is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE,” Trump wrote. “They better get their act together, and FAST!”
The controversy began after Mehr published what it claimed were the details of the agreement Trump had discussed publicly. According to the report, the proposed arrangement would include the United States providing Iran with $300 billion for reconstruction efforts, a complete withdrawal of American troops from the region, continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, and a pledge that the United States would refrain from military engagement with Iran’s proxy groups.
Those reported provisions immediately triggered backlash from several prominent conservative voices, many of whom questioned whether such terms would be acceptable if they were accurate.
Among the first to react was pro-MAGA commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon, who sharply criticized the reported framework.
“This is a total capitulation by the greatest superpower to ever exist to a terror state whose economy and navy no longer exist,” she wrote on social media.
Ungar-Sargon added that if the reported details were genuine, she believed the president should reject the agreement.
The leaked claims also renewed criticism from conservative radio host Erick Erickson, who has expressed frustration with repeated predictions that a deal with Iran is imminent.
Erickson noted that Trump has repeatedly suggested negotiations were nearing completion, while a final agreement has yet to emerge.
“The President, the other day, said Iran was playing us,” Erickson wrote. “The only one being played is President Trump.”
He also argued that tensions in the region remain unresolved despite ongoing diplomatic efforts and questioned the effectiveness of the ceasefire currently in place.
The dispute highlights the uncertainty surrounding negotiations and the challenges of reaching a durable agreement in a region long marked by conflict, mistrust, and competing interests. While Trump has projected confidence that a deal could soon be finalized, Friday’s clash over the reported terms underscored just how fragile the process remains.
For now, the White House and Iranian state media appear to be offering sharply different accounts of what, if anything, has actually been agreed to, leaving observers waiting to see whether a finalized arrangement will emerge in the days ahead.
[READ MORE: Marjorie Taylor Greene Blasts Trump’s Inflation Remark, Warns It Could Become Political Liability]
